As the saying goes, war never changes, but this is only partly true of the Front Mission series, which puts players in control of a group of wanzer pilots as they try to outmanoeuvre the opposing side. The first game in the series has seen a whole host of remakes and releases, with the latest, Front Mission 1st: Remake, landing on Nintendo Switch. It brings all the drama and fantastic storytelling that have become the hallmarks of the series along with a modern look and sound for current audiences.
The plot of Front Mission 1st: Remake follows the conflict between two coalitions of nations. The OCU, which represents nations in the South Asian, South East Asian, and Australian regions, and the USN, which represents the North and South American continents, are locked in an ongoing cold war. Each wants control of Huffman Island and has sent their wanzer forces to shift the balance of power on the island in their favour.
The original SNES release of Front Mission back in 1995 allowed players to play as OCU captain Royd as he tries to track down the man who killed his fiancée during a mission known as the Larcus Incident. In 2003, the game was rereleased as Front Mission 1st, offering a chance for players to play through a campaign from the USN point of view. Both of these campaigns, with their interwoven-yet-separate stories and intriguing plot twists, are available here.
Front Mission 1st: Remake succeeds when it lets the characters and drama take centre stage. It takes a while for the plot to ramp up, particularly in the OCU campaign, but when it does it is difficult to tear yourself away from the story. There are all the betrayals and friendships that you’d expect from a war story, set in a world that is distinct from our own yet eerily similar at times. Fans of these stories will find plenty of juicy moments to sink their teeth into, though the fact that the plot is delivered with a collection of talking heads and text boxes makes the game feel more dated than the upgraded visuals would suggest.
Between scenes of dialogue are the missions that must be completed for players to advance the plot. Wanzers — the highly customisable mechs that are at the heart of the conflict in the Front Mission series — can move around the map and must contend with different terrain while trying to get into position to attack incoming enemies. They can use a variety of weapons, either held in their hands or mounted on their shoulders, to damage their enemies and protect themselves. Outfitting your squad with the right mix of close-range and long-range attacks as well as the right combination of items and special abilities is the key to getting your squad out alive.
As much fun as the plot of Front Mission 1st: Remake is, much of that joy gets sucked out of the actual combat portions of the game. Particularly in early levels, both players and their enemies are frighteningly inaccurate with their weapons, resulting less in epic battles and more in awkward slap-fighting against each other. Even when you manage to position yourself brilliantly, you will find your units unable to strike the killing blow in conflicts that drag on and on.
This problem is exacerbated by the fact that characters have separate health bars for the body, right and left arms, and legs. Depleting the body’s health will destroy the wanzer, taking out the right or left arm will disable the weapon held in that hand, and destroying the legs will slow down their movement. This could be an interesting concept, except most weapons target a random body part, so there are times when a foe will limp on with a single hit point in their body while the player’s pilot will inexplicably target currently their undamaged legs. The overreliance on chance is more frustrating than anything else and slows down what should be simple conflicts.
While story missions take up the bulk of the gameplay, players can also dip into the Arena to earn some extra cash by betting on the outcome of their fights. There is the opportunity to grind for cash to buy much-needed equipment and weapons, but this aspect isn’t any more fun or engaging than the main campaign. It removes the movement aspect of the combat, relying almost entirely on being better equipped than the enemy to win and hoping that the random dice rolls don’t bring you crashing down.
This is particularly annoying because the graphical upgrade here is substantial. Vehicles look impressive, with small details like working windshield wipers bringing them to life despite their stylised look. The attention to detail is especially obvious when it played on docked mode, when many of the details pop beautifully off the screen. Wanzers move fluidly and feel like they should be powerful war machines, yet they miss so often that we couldn’t help but wonder if they weren’t still in the testing phase. All the visual improvements in the world couldn’t salvage what became an unfortunate slog.
You can play through the game without the graphical upgrades, but you’ll also miss out on the many of the quality of life improvements that the newest version offers. The original soundtrack, which already pushed the SNES soundcard to its limit, has been updated for modern consoles, while the ability to rotate the camera around the battlefield is the most welcome improvement to the gameplay portions. The only thing that is missing would be updating character portraits to make them more dynamic and vibrant.
Front Mission 1st: Remake is best enjoyed as a great war story with the occasional combat mission to play through. The heavily randomised mechanics aren’t improved by the impressively upgraded graphics and soundtrack. If you're desperate for a mech game to play, we suggest lowering the difficulty so you can move through the two campaigns without feeling hampered by the gameplay.
Conclusion
Unless you’re a die-hard fan of the original or the TRPG genre in general, you’re probably safe to give this one a miss or just lower the difficulty of the combat to enjoy the story. Despite the strengths of the setting and the characters, the gameplay becomes more frustrating than fun and won’t keep most players engaged past the first few hours. It’s a shame because there is a brilliance to telling the same story from two opposing points of view, but that gets buried beneath poorly implemented mechanics. Unfortunately, modern visuals and sound can't salvage gameplay here that feels too random to be satisfying.
Comments 84
I loved this game when I played it way too long ago. It was hard, it was in japanese (which I dont understand) but I loved every thing about it: the design, the music and atmosphere, the combat. I will replay this just for nostalgia.
Oof, this score feels harsh to me. I played the DS version last year and I found it mostly tough but fair and overall a really strong game. Did they change the mechanics at all for the remake?
I'm gonna pick this one up to show support for (hopefully) more FM games in the future. I can't wait for the remakes of 2 & 3!
This game is amazing. It might not be for everyone, but if there is any part of you that finds it appealing I strongly suggest you give it a go.
This game is a remake of a remake. A remastered remake. Nothing has changed drastically, and you can revert things back to pretty close to original if you so desire. It is a classic, and very good.
8/10
You suggest lowering the difficulty to enjoy the story? Lowering the difficulty in a tactical RPG? This particular genre of games thrive on their gameplay to deliver their experience. Its why they get the tactical or strategy name to it. If you remove the difficulty in gameplay, you are bound to get a very bland experience which might be no different that seeing a movie (but you are supposed to play boring bits of it). Where do you get these reviewers and what is their background with the games they are playing.....
To the reader who is interested in this game, if you like tactical/strategy RPGs and you fancy the mecha setting, this is a safe bet for you. The RNG mechanics that this reviewer clearly dislikes are nothing that you cant beat by proper planning and calculating your position, equipment and attacks. If battles take long... so yeah that is probably what many fans of this genre like (this doesn't have to be a quick fast paced action or fighting game). In general quite a bad take on the review but I cant blame it since it feels to me the reviewer had little interest in the genre from the start.
Reviewer could have just said "I don't like Front Mission games, so I did not like this" and saved themselves quite a bit of time.
@Wisps Yeah I'm getting "prefers visual novels" vibes from this guy.
How would this game compare to something like XCOM 2? Currently really enjoying that, and I think I'd be interested in other games similar to it
@Dynadan If you like XCOM it's a safe bet you'd like this too. Biggest difference is I think XCOM is easier.
If you don't like the TRPG genre, you shouldn't be reviewing TRPGs. As someone who doesn't like the genre myself, I was never going to get this game because I'm not in it's target audience. If I was interested in the genre, I'd want to know if the Front MIssion remake is a good TRPG and I'm not getting that from this review.
I hope this isn't like a ban offense or anything, but we're about to find out. This review is more on point:
https://www.destructoid.com/reviews/review-front-mission-1st-remake-switch/
@GuyProsciutto I think they have adopted a philosophy in this site that the reviews should be done by people that play any game since any gamers could be interested in this one. Its a nice idea in theory but I feel some particular cases like a remake of a niche strategy game are more aimed to small group of fans who want to see if its similar to the original version.. or to similar strategy games.
Nintendolife been HATING on trpgs lately
This is on a slight launch discount on the US eShop so I’m definitely diving in. I have it on DS but this really looks fantastic and worthy of a “double-dip,” if you will.
See y’all on the battlefield, Wanzerites!
I need more mechs in my life. Just watched Avatar 1 last night and I’m really wanting to get inside of a mech (but to fight on the blue side of course, not the marines.)
Front Mission 3 was my first FM, and it immediately became one of my (still all-time) favorites. Looking forward to this one, as I'm not sure how I don't have a DS copy. Bring on 2 and 3 as well!
So uh, this gets the penalty for not being a Nintendo series like Fire Emblem I guess!
Trent's got plenty of experience with TRPGs, and the review states clearly the elements of this particular one that he didn't get on with. A 5/10 is 'Average', which aligns with his overall thoughts. It's fine to disagree, but let's not start calling into question his appropriateness for the review because you disagree with his opinion, please.
@dluxxx What TRPGs have we been hating on?
The score is probably too low considering the positives, but not being able to target specific parts is an issue in the first three games. 4 and 5 add in a skill that allows for targeting, but it's a bizarre omission in general that does make battles drag on.
This review totally miss the point…
If the guy who write this hates Nintendo / Japanese games / tactical RPG, what’s the point in giving your opinion?
There are a lot of other reviews online and they all give a solid 7 to the game.
@Goofonzo I’m assuming you played the snes version from ur post, would you say the remake is worth playing over it? Can’t decide if I was gonna experience this first or the original
In less than 20 posts, this comment section has gone from “I disagree” to “It is a known fact that this man hates TRPGs and so should not be allowed to review them!”.
This review reads like it was written by someone who doesn't enjoy old-school tactical RPGs. Some of these criticisms could be applied to most Fire Emblem games as well.
5/10 seems weirdly low when almost every aspect of the game, per the review, is on point.
@dartmonkey I understand and it was not my intention to attack him or make this a personal comment on how he does his job. However I think when you write your piece of work in a public site like this, you are exposed to being criticized. And I believe what I wrote is professional criticism. His review opinion dislikes elements that are consistent with the tactical strategy genre, which inevitably brings the question if this is more of a review of the game or the genre itself. Moreover the reviewer included some very personal hot-takes like lowering the difficulty (and this was done twice) that are easy to disagree with if you are the kind of player who enjoys tactical games. Professional opinions need to be carefully written so that you provide enough insight into games for both newcomers and veterans of the series.
While I think a '5' review score is a little low, it simply means it's 'average'. If I had to score this myself it would probably get a 6 or 7 since it really doesn't provide anything new in terms of gameplay or quality of life updates. However it's still a fun game if you keep your expectations reasonable going in. Seeing a physical version is a good sign for Front Mission 2 and 3, although importing a physical copy is both expensive and will take a while.
@Zoda_Fett From what I've played and the other reviews I've watched there are some tweaks to the original, but overall it's faithful. I prefer the old graphics, but this is great too.
@Munchlax It's a difference of tastes. He's obviously able to write a well thought out review.
@Wisps Well said on #23.
I get that the review rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, but for me as someone with no real experience with Front Mission games (though I have played a lot of other TRPGs like Tactics Ogre and Final Fantasy Tactics), the frequent missing and random targeting sound like pretty big problems to me. Is it as bad as the reviewer makes it sound? I much rather miss or mis-aim my attacks because of my own poor tactics rather than RNG.
So I can't speak on this game but I'll be honest, even if you love this game, yeah I have no interest in dealing with hours of constant misses in a turn based strategy title. That would be a deal breaker for me, immediately. I refuse. Quite frankly, it sounds like I would hate this!
But I'll also tell you that I don't like very many turn based strategy titles in the first place.
@kkslider5552000 If you spend time with it you will see that there are ways to mitigate what the reviewer was talking about. And the point of the game in one aspect is to improve your squad. So starting out being amazing would make that later game less enthralling. It's a whole package thing. It's about leveling up, getting better equipment. It's like that on purpose (and not as bad as the reviewer made it sound.)
the difficulty doesnt deter me. its the price. imo it would have been an amazing deal to get all three remakes in one package on cardridge. releasing them one by one at a hefty price point is a big no-no for me and I won't support this. If anything I will buy this during an e-shop clearance, lmao
This is definitely a 7/10 to me, for it to get a 5/10 is insulting. Either that or the reviewer isn't good with tactical mech game.
@Poco_Lypso I definitely agree with you. I am in fact quite excited for the difficulty and the RNG (as opposed to this review), however the price is so steep for a remake of a remake! I will probably keep this in the wishlist until it gets a bit cheaper.
@Wisps We absolutely welcome constructive criticism and questions in the comments, but I wouldn't class "Where do you get these reviewers and what is their background with the games they are playing....." as such.
In this instance, perhaps an optional ability to target specific areas would have been a good addition to a remake that has been modernised in various other ways. Trent's suggestion that you might knock the difficulty down so as not to miss out on other stronger parts of the experience is naturally a personal take — as is the entire review. He finishes up by clarifying that uberfans of the original and genre devotees may find more to like about it, which simply means he expected more from this remake, not that he hates the game or TRPGs.
Anyhow, I've got nothing more to add. I just wanted to address this odd sentiment that a reviewer is somehow 'wrong' for the game because they weren't enamoured with a core element of it. If you enjoy the RNG, great! You'll likely want to add points to the score above. That doesn't invalidate their opinion of someone who didn't enjoy it.
@Herna Tactics Ogre got a 7/10, hardly "craptastic".
@Poco_Lypso These will be cheap on the eShop soon. Easily a $10 pickup in the near future.
@Wisps most definitely! its priced at 35$/eur iirc, thats 100 EUR for 3 remakes, digital on top. I would have totally paid 60eur for a 3in1 package on cardridge. Will prolly wait until the end of the switch' lifespan with this purchase - who knows maybe they will release a 3in1 after all. Ordered Trails from Zero today - gotta support those devs to bring more trails games to switch
@Goofonzo thats exactly the price point I am looking for. I generally tend to never buy eshop titles unless they are heavily discounted. I might make an exception for persona 3 and 4 tho
@Poco_Lypso You're in luck then. Square Enix does deep discounts often. I think by spring it will be on sale often for that $10, especially if it doesn't sell well.
“Even when you manage to position yourself brilliantly, you will find your units unable to strike the killing blow in conflicts that drag on and on.”
Sounds like the original X-Com
@dartmonkey We will agree to disagree then. I think a big ongoing internet discussion on whether the reviewer is up to the task or not to be able to review a game its out of the question (since he already did), but the fact remains that his work shown here does not provide a good example of the background he possess. And there is nothing wrong for asking professionals qualifications. People do it everytime at any job and it should not be considered an offense.
But all of this is meaningless into the discussion of this game, again I would encourage people that are somehow interested in this game to get a second opinion. You do not need to be an uberfan of this genre to enjoy it.
Having not played the game, I cannot say whether this review reasonably aligns with consensus or not.
But I can say, Tactics Ogre is one of the most highly regarded SRPGs of all time, and it getting a 7/10 does at least give me some reluctance to trust reviews of the genre here. Not that I necessarily disagree with that score, because I haven't played enough of the game to make a determination myself, but I'm a diehard srpg fan in the community and the consensus is that it's one of the best ever made. Is it possible it just doesn't hold up? Ya, it's possible. But given the staggering overhauls and changed made, I find it rather unlikely.
@jerrycoeurl I get the feeling Nintendo Life is scoring harsher recently and think that’s a good thing. 5/10 is a supposed to be an average score. It doesn’t seem unreasonable to me that someone might think this is average. Like 50% of games technically should score below average. For some reason average has come to mean bad in Anglo societies.
@Goofonzo yeah haha that’s the problem, the spritework on the snes version looks beautiful but I don’t think the remake looks bad either honestly. Thanks for the info tho!
@roboshort I agree, but then they go and slap 9's and 10's on pretty much every Nintendo first party release. Which I do not agree with.
And here I thought the era of "if a game forces you got git gud, it sucks" was over. Yes, the SNES original was harsh, but it was never XCOM harsh with its misses. The DS remake kept the difficulty at exactly the same level and I have a suspicion so does this version given the volume of reverence contained in the music and visuals.
If you suck at TTRPGs, maybe you shouldn't be reviewing them as a job?
@dartmonkey the issue is that the caveats you describe do not justify giving a remake of a remake of one of the pillars of the genre an 5/10 just because an aspect of the combat system was not overhauled. 7/10 maybe, but not any less.
Y'all didn't give Dark Souls' Switch version a 5/10 for not being easier than its original release. It got a 9/10. The difficulties laid out in this review do not justify the difference in treatment, you see?
wow, this comments section is insufferable. "mAyBe YoU sHoUldN't Be ReViEwInG tHiS" is virtually always a snobbish stance outside of conflicts in interest. do y'all literally just want reviewers who regurgitate the stance you want to hear, or do you want a variety of honest opinions?
a game which is getting a lot of 7/10's everywhere else getting a 5/10 is not unusual, especially considering that there are different ways of quantifying a rating.
Why does every Nintendo Life review comment section have to turn into a warzone?
@roboshort
That's totally fair, and maybe "harsh" was the wrong word choice, but what I meant was I played the DS remake last year and it was far better than an "average" game to me. That's why I asked if the mechanics had been changed because that game was an easy 7/10 for me and as far as I was aware this one is exactly the same but with a nicer coat of paint.
The comments here show why it's wise to get reviews from more than one source, to balance out the views.
I enjoyed this game the first time round, but now it’s certainly showing it’s age, the atmosphere just doesn’t feel right. I played the recent battletech game (2018) on steam which feels like a natural evolution of this series
Reviews are ultimately opinions, but believe me, you wouldn't want me to review the latest Cowadoody no matter how good it is, I am simply not into generic military FPS. Likewise, perhaps this could have been handed to a more suitable reviewer.
I’m wondering if the reviewer ever played any of the originals. After playing for a few hours they definitely improved many aspects of the game. I would have at least given this 8/10 but I’ve always loved the Front Mission series, especially Front Mission 3
This isn't a genre I have sought out or played much of but I loved Front Mission 3 and have played 1st on DS. I'm sure I will enjoy it again and I have bought it day 1 on the good will (and endless hours) 3 afforded me. Seems like a perfect Switch handheld game to me
I miss when this site had reviewers like Mark MSX that actually cared about the games and genres they were writing about.
@nimnio there are games that deserve a 5/10 and there are games that got 4/10 that I enjoyed more thab some 9/10s. The issue is specifically with the disbelief that this particular game deserves so low a score.
Once again, some well-regarded classic games are re-released and panned by critics, who say they are "old" and "outdated". Sometimes MetaCritic lies.
They took the classics, presenting them as they were released, with a new coat of paint (that you can toggle off). I am of the opinion that a 9/10 or 10/10 game from the 90s is well-worth playing today.
@Goofonzo They gave Scarlett and Violet a 7 though. Just seemed to me like they had been scoring harsher of late. I think that it does ruin their credibility a little when games like Mario Strikers and 3 Hopes get 9s. I imagine they are fine games, but “Amazing” seems like a bit of a stretch. They don’t hand out many 10s so not sure what you are talking about there
@roboshort you gotta take all reviews with a grain of salt. working for nintendolife means you gotta have at least an acquired taste for nintendo games and know how to approach them. the lack of a challenge found in many nintendo games might not be for everyone and some people would score a game lower just because of it.
The game is challenging, but at the same time addictive and very correct. It would seem that there is too much politics and unreliable rating in recent reviews. Either the reviewer has no idea what they're doing or they just got ordered to lie.
... strange how Shiryu remains quiet in all of this.
@roboshort Look at their reviews tab, filter by score, select 10, and the ones that are 10 are pretty much all Nintendo games.Way more than 75%. I know it's a Nintendo website full of Nintendo fans, but it's biased. Heavily.
@Poco_Lypso Case in point, this review.
@dartmonkey I totally get defending your guy here. I would do the same if I was you. 100%. Spot on.
However, being a big girls blouse because everyone went to the comments to take a huge dumper on the score should indicate that the community strongly disagrees with your colleague. Don't get defensive, get the white board out and make a plan. Write in big letters "TRENT DOESN'T GET TO REVIEW TURN BASED STRATEGY GAMES ANYMORE" on it and move on.
@Goofonzo tbh I am not defendening him. just trying to understand where he is coming from and the way nintendo games getting reviewed in general, its about easy fun that everyone can pick up and play. once you have acquired such attitude more demanding games might be a turn off for both the reviewer and the fanbase. therefore I think the reviewer just couldn't handle the game, the stress level etc. and assumed the fanbase will feel the same way and thought a 5/10 will be a proper warning. is this review unbiased? clearly not! is the game a 5/10? sounds more like a 7/10! will the majority of nintendo fans find joy playing it? prolly not!
Do you think they will port it to Steam?
I've been read-only for many years on this site, and just registered here to tell you that this review is an all-time low. Original Front Mission is one of the best trpgs ever, to this day, it's a true classic. It's hard, yeah, but deep and fair, and fans of the genre loves all these things. Remake may not be without fault, but is a solid good work, and is essentially the same game with updated visuals. Sad to see such an incompetent and biased opinion, and even more sad that the text of the review itself not justifies the score given at the end of it. Even if it's not your cup of tea, it's a really good game at its core, a cult classic, favored by many. And it's not a bad remake at all, given what we saw in the past year in terms of a classics' treatment (such as Chrono Cross and Blade Runner). Maybe next time give the game to a person who cares about the genre at all, or played something older than Mario + Rabbids.
Removed - unconstructive feedback; user is banned
After Into the Breach, I have a really hard time going back to RNG-based tactics games. The name itself is an oxymoron, there's not much tactical thought to rolling a dice and hoping for the best. The game is 20 years old so I can't fault it, but if you're putting it up against all the other games released since then I absolutely think a 5 is fair.
People - if you're already a FM fan then you already know if you're going to buy this. You don't need your opinion validated to enjoy something.
If you've never played the series before or are new to TRPGs in general, this review points out that you're probably not gonna have a good time unless you have a high tolerance for old school mechanics.
A review is to help people decide on if they should play something. If you already know the answer (you love FM, etc.) then why are you even here? Go play it.
As someone who played and loved Front Mission 1st on DS, my best advice is to stick with it and not give up in the early game. The arena is important for grinding. And while the wanzer pilots have accuracy problems in the early game, they eventually learn techs that allow them to focus on specific parts. I may be biased, but I'm sold on it.
@BlueKnight07 This is a great advice and I agree. It is part of the progression and hardships of starting weak but getting optimized with better techs and equipment. You are supposed to be inexperienced and erratic at the beggining of the game imo. It works in favor of the narrative.
Yeah I kind of agree with this review from what I have played so far. at least the first part of it anyway. haha I played the original back in the day and have the ds version as well. I think it does deserve more of a higher score id say a 7-7.5 out of 10. if they had the battle scenes in the perspective and detail modelling of say the area, the battles would drag less maybe? feel more dynamic? I feel even on the past games, there was that discrepancy of a unit having 1 HP for example on the body but your unit will shoot the legs instead haha. i feel like that dice roll of combat damage has always been in the game. until they added skills like in FM3, where you can target the body and limbs etc. I do like the sped up battles. I would still recommend this game to anyone that hasn't played the original or DS version.
Second reviewer that didn't actually play the game long enough to get the guide skill and thus inaccurately says you can't target individual enemy parts.
Its a late game ability guys. You're not supposed to be able to just own the enemy right away. It's an RPG remember? This is more like 7/10 for a series fan at least.
You get Guide and Aim later on when, you know, your pilots get better at being pilots. It could trivialize the combat if you started with those from the beginning, gambling how you want your damage to be done is a core part of the game, and that hasn’t changed. That said FM First had and still isn’t really the best balanced, that becoming part of its charm as a faithfully recreated first entry for the series. I do think the studio could have elevated this remake by giving the skill system a total overhaul and starting the Black Hounds with a few low level skills (and harder early missions) since they’re special forces pilots. But overall this is a good remake of a good game.
If you want to target enemy parts from the beginning, NG+. I did seven times over on my original DS cart.
Oh also I hope the reviewer didn’t try to do the UCS campaign without beating the OCU campaign first. The game is not lying when it says the UCS campaign is for experienced players. I rarely get through the first mission without failing once, without the help of UCS NG+ stats.
@dartmonkey but there IS an ability to target specific parts, for both guns and missiles. Aim and Guide respectively. These are skills that the pilots unlock as they level up.
I understand that a reviewer may not have time to get through the whole campaign but saying you cannot target specific parts for the whole game is factually incorrect. Also if the reviewer was trying to play the UCS campaign at the same time, that could have influenced his comments on difficulty. That campaign is very much meant to be harder, even for a player that just beat the first campaign.
@roboshort That's fine if they stick with it. When the next crappy Yoshi game gets a 9, I'll know they have no integrity.
Was playing this remake last night and got the guide skill upon encountering the UCS 64th Squadron which is about the 5th or so mission in the game. So really it doesn't actually take that long to start getting skilled up.
@nimnio Nintendo games do score highly, but you can do what you jut proposed and see that there are many more unbiased reviews on some ***** Nintendo games. Whereas this site usually pumps them up far beyond the average.
@WanzerAce oh that's good they have skills in this. I don't remember them being in the other releases of 1. its been awhile though haha
Removed - unconstructive feedback
@HotGoomba Because the same way that most people do not READ the whole review, some reviewers here do not finish the games before the review. Also, there is no coherence among them.
Remember the reviewer (who is banned on Twitter) who hated ecchi visual novels reviewing... ecchi visual novels?!
@dartmonkey Without criticism no one would ever improve. The only time criticism isn't helpful is if it's unconstructive or hurtful.
Reviews really need to be updated post-patch. Not that I come here for the reviews. Eh..
@WiiWareWave @dartmonkey
"Without criticism no one would ever improve. The only time criticism isn't helpful is if it's unconstructive or hurtful."
this is such a good point and the reason that I share my thoughts about these things at the risk of being unpopular. ✌️
I'm way late to this game but this is such a good example of how much clarity the reader might get if the reviewer states up front whether/which games of the genre they like, which they dislike, and how they feel about the first game (if they played it, ffs) and, if they remember the release of the first game.
its seems dreadfully obvious to me to include this for context but im surprised how much it's glossed over, particularly on this page. the recent eiyuden chronicles review had similar issues.
great site, and your contributions go way beyond your reviews (many of which are excellent.) thanks for doing all you do. ❤️✊
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...