Having never been any sort of tennis fan for my entire childhood — Wimbledon always seemed a bit posh to me — I fell completely and utterly in love with the sport in my teenage years through the medium of video games.
Yes. Video games. They're a whole thing! And just as has been the case with American football, basketball, and ice hockey, my initial interest in tennis was stoked by a game; in this case, the incredible Super Tennis on SNES.
It was the first time I got it, you see - the strategy behind this most magnificent of sports. Yes, it was but a sliver of the game's real-world depth, but getting a handle on little things like the placement of the ball, the drawing of your opponent into positions on the court where you can then take advantage, timing and picking your shots...it turned out a good game of tennis was every bit as exciting as all those action efforts I'd been playing. Yes, even you, Street Fighter 2.

Fast-forward the guts of a decade, and we got two epic tennis efforts arriving within two months of each other on consoles in the forms of Mario Tennis on N64, and one of the true loves of my life, Virtua Tennis, which at the time I was playing on a Dreamcast. (I'm so very sorry.)
I mention these two games because, for me, they marked the point where I chose my own tennis adventure through this particular video game life I'm currently living, such as it is. Instead of rolling with the chaotic fun of Mario and all the wacky stuff he brings to the tennis table, I decided I wanted to get down with 'real tennis' in a sim-style, as presented through Virtua Tennis' haunted celebrity tennis faces.
Whilst I have dabbled with all of the Mario Tennis games — and tried really hard with Mario Tennis Aces — my main issue with the series has always been that, in giving us a new twist on a formula, the twist presented just didn't warrant shifting focus from something as pure and competitive as, well, normal tennis. I've also found over the years and through various iterations that the goofy mechanics introduced (such as Aces' trick shots) have always felt a little frustrating, they ruin the flow of a match for me, and honestly, it's all a bit too much to be bothered concentrating on for this particular Andy Murray.

So, I never really wanted to engage with souped-up powers or star shots or any of that guff as a result. Give me tennis, lads. Give me glorious tennis, pure and undiluted. Give me big, sweaty Tim Henman. Or! Give me a wacky alternative that feels good enough that I'm not immediately headed into the menus to turn all the special moves off.
Enter Mario Tennis Fever, a game I expected to enjoy but put down fairly quickly in favour of getting back to Tennis Elbow 4 (now there's a Switch 2 port I'd like to see). It seems this time out, though, Camelot has other ideas, as with this first serving of Switch 2 Mario Tennis action, we've finally got wacky Mushroom Kingdom mechanics that sing ever-so sweetly, and an arcade tennis effort that might be the first where I'd rather keep the special powers switched on, thanks very much. (Yes, they can also be switched off, mate - cool it.)
The key to this, firstly, is the introduction of the game's titular Fever rackets. There's a generous selection of powered-up sticks to choose from, and each one imbues your chosen character with a fun trick. Heck, you can even equip two of them at a time in certain modes. Now, I'm sure you've seen lots of these by now, and maybe it all seems a little old-hat when you first lay eyes on the usual array of elemental-based shenanigans. There's a simplicity here, though, that overcomes the overcomplicated and messy vibe that I felt keenly in Aces.

Each character on the game's lovely big colourful roster of Nintendo faves has their own base stats, and you can then choose to use any racket you've unlocked (I won't spoil 'em) to avail of its special powers. So you've got a few layers of strategy and stats, but it's also immediately obvious how everything works, and we don't even need to worry about flicking sticks around for a variety of special moves or any of that tempo-ruining baloney.
The next crucial aspect is how powers are deployed. Choosing a fever racket — let's say I've got the game's Ice racket, and my opponent has the twister-producing Ty-Phoo racket — a match starts as normal, and as we play, we build our fever gauges. When full, we can then pull off a fever shot, which, once it touches the ground, will produce the fever effect intended. Keep it from hitting the ground (in what's often a very intense rally) and the window for its power to take effect will run out.
So, through skill, you can stop an opponent from using their power. What's more, you can ensure that you bring it crashing down on their side of the court to have them eat their own punishment.

In this simplicity, we are gifted a game that gives me the sort of feeling usually reserved for true multiplayer greats like Mario Kart. Each racket's ability is easy to comprehend; it's easy to read how a mud slick might affect a game, for example, and by keeping it simple in this way, players are free to focus on movement and proper tennis strategy at the same time.
That's not to say it doesn't get crazy with piranha plants and fire and all that stuff: it does. But it feels much more controlled and concise in what it wants from you, as a player.
So we get a balance that means I'm happy to play with these powers engaged at all times. A first! By allowing me to move around the court normally, to utilise the usual array of slices and spins, lobs, and net shots freely, and without making me do somersaults or slow-motion physical feats that ruin the flow of the ball smacking every 10 seconds, we're onto a winner.

In fact, in the midst of a tournament match, and against some surprisingly smart CPU players (even the doubles partners are good), the pairing of wild powers with more realistic movement parameters makes for a game that I cannot wait to jump into online. Indeed, it feels as though it may very well have that very special sort of Mario Kart online magic to it that I personally feel is currently missing from the latest iteration in that series.
Even in the ever-present star shots, things have been made to feel as though Camelot has considered everything much more carefully. Rather than launching me into the air and wasting my time, or any of that caper, getting onto these simply gives me a one-off, more powerful shot. Again, not messing so much with the core tennis that it's affected.
Now to the one actual problem. Modes! I was hoping the adventure campaign was going to have some special RPG magic for single players, but alas, it's three to four hours of basically learning how to play. We do get a few fun face-offs and it's always a laugh, but it's short and fairly basic in what it sets out to do, with a handful of boss fights that have you pick the right shot to do damage. You know the drill.

This continues in the game's tournament and trial tower offerings. They're good while they last, and surprisingly challenging on harder settings, but I want more! For a strictly solo player, there's not a lot to pick at over time here, even with the minigames of Mix It Up (shooting hoops for points, anyone?) and a rather lacklustre motion-control mode that I tried and turned off, as it's not 1:1 and feels like a faff.
With more than one player, there are plenty of ways to play locally with pals, and online lobbies feel like where I'll spend all of my time. Matches I played — which are split into Fever/non-Fever racket variants of single and doubles — were quick to find and lag-free in my (limited, review-period) experience.
You can also play tournaments and trials in co-op, which definitely gives these modes more legs, and the free play mode allows four players to mix up the rules, switch off Fever rackets, and play best-of-five-set stunners that'll have you all sweating buckets.

It's lucky, given the disappointing adventure offering, that the tennis here is so sweet, and easily the sort of thing I reckon has a long online life ahead. It helps, too, that it looks superb, never dropping a notable frame in docked or handheld.
With 14 courts (replete with environmental gimmicks that can be switched off), 38 characters, 30 (!) racket types to dig into mastering, this is 100% my favourite Mario Tennis to date and one I can see being a hit online for some time to come.
Now, where did I put my pen? I've gotta go sign a load of giant novelty balls on my way out of here.
Conclusion
Mario Tennis Fever serves up my favourite game in the series thus far, by finding an addictive balance between Mario's madcap antics and real-world tennis fun. Streamlining superpowers into Fever rackets makes everything easier to parse, and keeping player movement relatively restrained makes for tennis matches that retain an exciting flow without constant slo-mo interruptions.
The adventure mode is a letdown, and solo players don't have a ton of options, but there's depth and strategy at the core here that should see this one ace things online for some time to come.





Comments 212
Ugh. Was hoping the adventure mode would have some extra meat to it.
Ah dammit, really hoped the adventure mode would have some substance and around 15 hours of gameplay and I would've been there day fifteen.
Yeah, that's about what I expected. I'd say that this'll probably end up being the best Mario Sports game since Mario Golf World Tour.
(What do you mean, World Tour is 12 years old?!)
Damn, adventure mode was the main reason for buying... probably going to cancel my preorder...
Yup, just as I thought. A bare bones single player campaign and an over reliance on online play with dumb, one note gimmicks thrown in to justify its existence. I'm sick and tired of Mario Sports games being so lazy. I truly haven't enjoyed Mario Sports games as a whole since the Gamecube, with the exception of Strikers Charged on the Wii. These spin offs just don't have the same depth or oomph as they used to.
Lack content for Solo Mode?
Oh, gosh....
I already thinking it will be like Splatoon situation.
Maybe I will check other 3rd party cartoonish Tennis games for more Solo content.
Hmm, not sure if it's worth the investment if I already have Aces.
I think I will pass it.
Little disappointed that the Adventure mode is about the same as Aces, which I thought was really lame since that game actually had no other modes at launch, and even now really, but I do hope at least the other modes they showed add some time to it. Probably will have to wait despite my initial excitement, but hopefully when I pick it up it will be at least close to Power Tennis.
Kinda what I expected I will give this a miss I’m not overly enthusiastic about online play was hoping for some decent single player modes multiplayer is always excellent with these kinds of games but it’s not enough to convince me especially considering the price
Thanks for the review, as much as I would've preferred more single player I'm glad to hear that the core gameplay, multiplayer, amount of contents at launch etc. are great (and honestly based on this even the former still seems to offer more than previous console Mario Tennis, I've played all games in this series except for the Virtual Boy one and only the handheld ones really focused on the single player) - so looking forward to playing it myself when I can!
Cool and good
So it’s Mario Tennis then. This has always been a multiplayer focused series anyway.
Well, this is a difficult sell for me. I was kind of relying on the Adventure Mode & extra stuff to differentiate from previous iterations, otherwise, it's just a slightly shinier version Mario Tennis.
Any news on whether this game is going to have any post-launch content? If there's a complete physical cartridge with all content on it, I might actually pick it up in the future.
I actually don't mind the shorter story mode.
Cons
Welp. This one's a no for me, then. Yay, money saved.
It feels weird to get tennis again, especially since there's no modern baseball or basketball Mario sports game
Uh...wow I thought my opinion was going to be unpopular but so far, the general consensus seems near unanimous.
Disappointed to hear the solo content is so minimal. Was hoping for more with the adventure mode.
I think I'll wait for a sale, the single player is what would've pushed me to a day 1 purchase but that's very limited according to the review.
I only skimmed through but can a single player play three and five set matches as in real tennis??
I’ll pass on this.
This game is as overrated as Mario Strikers Battle League was. What good is a fun core If there is nothing to do with It? Cutting costs and raising prices is no fun.
Nintendo have been really dropping the ball for solo players so far on Switch 2.
DK being the only real exception, even though I greatly enjoyed Metroid and Pokemon Z-A
Weak Adventure mode means wait for the sale, then. Got way too many other games in the upcoming months to bother with this.
@Johnny44 Yes
I mean I was unlikely to buy it anyway, but a lack of single-player content definitely means I’m out. I’ve yet to buy a Mario Sports title and the ones during the Switch and Switch 2 eras aren’t convincing me so far.
Single-player content sucks again, really?
They said that they will improve it, yet it seems like nothing has changed.
One thing if online would be free as back in Wii U/Nintendo 3DS days, but it's not.
Not worth trying even for free, imo.
Was always planning on skipping this one but appreciate the review so I know what the games strengths and weaknesses are.
"Adventure mode is disappointingly short and rather basic" as a fan of the old RPG adventure modes, this hurts a little bit
Thanks for the review PJ! I am really bummed out that Adventure Mode is short... I was hoping for something more this time around. I might get this at some point, but for now it seems I am better off waiting and getting some other games first.
I’ll get it, but so disappointing that it’s lacking in single player content….why is Nintendo doing this…..
No surprises here. Never did get my hopes up for a great adventure mode despite the unusual baby theme, but I’m here for the pick-up-and-play gameplay and good online, and it sounds like it delivers on that. I was tempted to worry about the Fever Rackets being a shoe-horned gimmick, but they apparently aren’t, so good.
I expect to have a good time with Fever. At the very least, I’ll enjoy it more than the overly-chaotic Aces.
Previous game was trash so won't be bothering with this either. Online doesn't interest me either and the people I met online were just annoying anyway.
Yet another disappointment in the Mario sports games lineup. Oh well at least there's High on Life 2 and Nioh 3 because I'm definitely going to be playing those.
@PJOReilly Thanks and are they full sets though or first to three games?
So it's a multiplayer party tennis game with a small single player mode?
Exactly as expected.
Honestly I didn't have any hopes it would be a JRPG-Tennis game like the GBA/GBC tennis games were. Still I miss those days.
But I did like Mario Tennis Aces on Switch, so I will still be picking this one up as well.
also it is 70 dollars..
@rockodoodle Because they seem to think only Gen Z exists. They've clearly forgotten that people like myself were born at a time the internet didn't exist at all.
I don't see why a multiplayer focused series lacking solo player content is a negative.
@Anti-Matter
Funnily enough, I was actually thinking of Splatoon as a actual substantial and enjoyable single player champaign that I wish Mario Tennis would use as an example in terms of scope for a real adventure mode (as opposed to the glorified tutorials this game and Aces use instead.)
Like... Splatoon has a proper story and 3D platforming. The single player is a fully fledged video game in its own right.
We know that Camelot can make top-callibre RPGs like Golden Sun. And every time they make a Mario sports game, they always advertise the story mode because they know people loved it in the GB games. But it's always an afterthought and its such a waste. I wasn't even surprised this time because I was already burned on Aces, but it's just so deflating.
@abbyhitter same. How did we go from the GBA Mario Tennis and Golf games excellent story modes to what we get now?
It sounds like it’s a Mario Tennis game. The short adventure mode isn’t a con to me. It’s an appetizer. And it sounds like the main course of frenetic multiplayer action is well worth the meal. I honestly can’t wait to play this one!
This sounds like it’ll be my go-to Mario multiplayer game on Switch 2 for the future. I loved Aces too, as much as, yes, I’ve got nostalgia for the GBA Mario Sports games. It sounds like Fever, like Aces, will be some good, clean, simple, gameplay-first fun and I appreciate that.
Just gotta go easy enough on the kids, so they can develop some skill…
I'm more of a single player guy, so this seems like a skip for me for now then. I'll get it on sale one day.
I wasn't going to get it as I barely touched aces (played more in a demo than the full game). But adventure mode would have tempted me if it had been a nice legthy solo play. So that makes my decision easy enough, it's a no from me
@Oldstalk
It's definitely not an absolute requirement, lots of multiplayer games have little to no single player.
At the same time, is it really too much to ask to want both? Splatoon & Kirby Air Riders are also amazing multiplayer games which just so happen to have single player modes that are excellent in their own rights.
What is an adventure mode if not something to satisfy people who want to play single-player?
@Oldstalk Yeah the comments are very bizarre. If this was a new 3D Mario fair enough but complaining a spin off sports game focuses on multiplayer is bizarre...
If you’re reading the comments before the review, save yourself some time and start with the 9th paragraph that when the game is first mentioned.
@Bats1234 Mario Power Tennis on Gamecube had a robust Single Player Campaign. If anything your comment only shows how out of touch you are just like Nintendo.
Yet another switch 2 exclusive that doesn’t do much for single players.
Reminds me of the soccer game. Definitely buyers remorse there. Loved the one on Wii.
Without a good single player mode this is an absolute no for me
@Axecon Exactly! So much potential and they're focusing on the same games over and over again. E.g., Switch 1 got 3 Mario Party games for some reason.
I don't give a lick about sports except racing BUT Mario sports games are the exception. This game look's fun!
Dang. The Single player mode was like the only reason I wanted to buy this
I don't really care for the Adventure mode, and most reviews say the actual tennis and gameplay are fun and that's what matters most to me in an arcade sport game. Pity to see that many people here are seemingly less interested to get it, as I hope online activity will remain for a decent amount of time. Still excited for this one!
@thenikdavies put the brakes on that statement chief. It has only been out about 8 months. Nintendo hasn’t put out a multiplayer focused bug title yet for the Switch 2 only yet.
I guess I'll be the devil's advocate and say that I'm happy the single player is short so I can get through it and get into online matches that much faster!
Will get it eventually. But its low priority for me as a single player mostly
I havent read the review, as Im at work, but with the lack of Adventure mode this really is just Mario Aces 2.0 and probably could've just been DLC or a Switch 2 version of that game. Sigh
Since singleplayer content is scars I will skip. I'd really love Nintendo to do better adventure modes in their sport games.
@Anti-Matter
You'll have to considering you don't own a Switch 2.
I’ll still get it. It just doesn’t read as good as aces. Aces had tight controls and online was great.
Story mode was a tutorial which I expect the same from this. Sports game and fighters are usually all about playing multiplayer or online. That’s where it’s meat is
I really hope we’re not going through the same cycle of releases as the switch. I’d like Nintendo to do something new / risky again with their Mario sports games.
Although I haven’t even played Aces even though i have it for years…
I'll buy this since I haven't bought a Mario Tennis since the 3DS outing, which I enjoyed in spite of it reviewing worse than this game.
It’s a first-party high profile game, of course it’s an eight. Even with barebones singeplayer content. That’s how we roll,
"A lack of content for solo players
Adventure mode is disappointingly short and rather basic"
same song, new verse. what happened to the Mario sports games? 🙁
if this were a generic sports game, it'd be a 6/10 at best and everyone knows it.
Did you guys score it higher just because it has Mario and Friends.
This sounds like it meets my expectations. I was never that bothered on a story mode. As largely a single player, I just wanted arcade tennis with some tournaments. Its how I pick up and play Power tennis on the cube. Anything else is a bonus.
I'm not one for Mario Tennis lore so the lack of a deep adventure mode isn't a massive loss for me.
This game actually looks really solid and I would love to pick it up at some point, I just can't justify its price at the moment.
@Bats1234
"but complaining a spin off sports game focuses on multiplayer is bizarre..."
you either didnt play the earlier mario sports titles (no crime ✌️) or you are being disingenuous.
@dazzleshell
Even I don't have Switch 2 yet, but I judged from the games first before making decisions.
Oh... I was hoping this time would be different, but I learned my lesson with Aces, where it was also 5 hour content for solo players... so they yet again show no interest in satisfying the campaign-focused player. I think I'm gonna pass unless some day it appears heavily discounted.
Thanks for the review anyway!
@Oldstalk
Because that’s the majority of first party switch 2 exclusives at this point. Other than DK us single players are left out to dry.
@PJOReilly Wonder if you know the answer to this: Does the local multiplayer force a split screen like Aces did, or is there a local multiplayer full court screen option (like the original Mario Tennis 64) ?
@Axecon
I think Tennis games sell more, and it is a beloved series.
Nintendo tried Baseball on the Gamecube, and despite the popularity of Baseball also in Japan, I don‘t think, this Cricket Game was a good seller… Baseball! Sorry, Baseball of course. Mixed those both complicated and crude sports games with special local love in my head 😉
But I agree, they could try some other sports. A Mario Basketball with the drive and fun of a NBA Jam would be cool
The author spent the majority of the article talking about other games. That tells me this is not a good game.
They seemed unexcited to start talking about this game. If the game was great, they would have come out of the gate talking about this game.
The trailer described adventure mode as a way to learn the game, so I sadly figured it was an extended tutorial. Nintendo probably shouldn’t have called it adventure since that’s not what you typically call a tutorial. I’m happy the gameplay itself is solid, and it of course looks great too. This will be a big maybe for me.
Can you only play online with a friend in rooms for matches or are you able to play other modes? Me and my brother are both getting the game and we live in different towns.
Honestly, i want this to be great, but as a single player, cant justify it. I'll have to stick to my gba classics for now :L
@The_Nintendo_Expat The console games never had any real single player content. It was always single player on the handheld and multiplayer on console. The Switch / Switch 2 versions are basically still "console" games even though the consoles are also handhelds.
Honestly I would love to see a purely single player focussed Tennis game. But I don't think there is enough market for. (read: casual players don't care)
Looks like I will be renting this one then.
I don't usually playing games like these online so I imagine that the content would seem pretty light for a solo player like me. I also have never been a huge fan of the character themed special moves. They always seemed super gimmicky to me and I always played with normal tennis rules when possible. I'll probably pass on this one unless it drops ludicrously low in price.
Yet another bare bones Mario game then. That seems like the default at the moment.
Unfortunately it’s gone from a day one buy to a „need a demo!“
My only reason to get this game is gone (campaign). Hopefully everyone will enjoy its multiplayer matches.
What would a meaty SP campaign look like at this point? How long would one be? I don't play a ton of sports games, so I'm not even sure what, if any, competition there is in the space.
I'm not saying the complaint isn't valid, but it is refreshing to be able to turn on a game and not be inundated with information about modes I don't care about and not even know where to start because the mode is buried in a list.
I tried out Madden when there was a demo weekend, and was completely lost and noped out of it after a minute.
Bought my kid FC one year, and had a ***** of a time just getting him into the game because I had to create a friggin' EA account.
Is there a middle ground?
I’m going to echo all the comments above - I was hoping for a solid single player portion, guess I’ll have to give this a miss now. Sad.
@Theghostofkeithmoon yeah you’re right it’s a thing of the past I guess it’s a shame cos the game isn’t the cheapest just another game I’m gonna have to miss out on
this is what I figured. I would never consider it anywhere close to worth this pricepoint then
Unfortunately experiences like Battle League and this new Mario Tennis were far from being the norm years ago, but now they seem to be the direction the industry is heading toward, which is a real shame in my opinion. This leads me to buy fewer to none Nintendo sports games. S2 MT's pricepoint makes zero sense to me
@koekiemonster
Yeah its been getting A 6.5/7 score everywhere so I fully expected A 8 here
I don't know if I'll get this, actually. Aces didn't have a lot of longevity for me, plus its online got kind of bad for me at times. If Fever's online does indeed turn out to be better, then I might get it on sale. Otherwise, I'll skip it.
I just wanted a cute story mode about the babies but this sounds pretty lame.
Well I'm looking forward to this shiny new Mario game at the weekend. Light single player? OK, there's more games than time as it is!
It is disappointing to hear that the Adventure Mode is rather short, it probably won't affect my enjoyment of the game, but it is still disappointing regardless
As a solo player im disappointed
That too bad about the solo player modes, I’m sure it will definitely be fun in multiplayer for sure. Probably won’t be a day 1 buy.
I gotta read up on a few other reviews to see how the tournament mode is for single player. If there is a lot of meat there, it could still be fun for single player. I'm not big on Adventure modes in these games, but there still needs to be something tangible to train / invest time into for single player.
Hot take but the older Mario Sports games people deem to be more feature rich… didn’t really have any more content. Like go back and play the Cube and Wii Mario sports games and if you actually just play solo, there’s not much solo content outside of a basic tournament mode and sometimes a story mode that isn’t super long and acts more like a glorified tutorial.
Most of us all just older now and not playing with friends as often. So I think our minds are blurred. That said, in a lot of cases, the older games had more creativity and style. That’s what I miss the most. And to be fair, I think it’s completely okay to expect more content than a gamecube game from the early/mid 2000’s. Especially for a $70 game that already looks so similar to its predecessor from 2018.
Overall from what I’ve been seeing, Fever looks pretty good and might be the best Mario Tennis game to date (with the exception of maybe Power Tennis specifically if you have a good group of friends for the minigames). But it’s hard to justify $70 for another “pretty good” and standard Mario Sports game in the current economy, at least for me.
If you’re a huge Mario Tennis fan, then sure, it’s probably fun and I hope you enjoy it. But I hope Nintendo goes harder with Golf (and brings back the 3-click mechanics and pizazz of older entries). Same with Strikers and Baseball, if we see those again.
@johnedwin
That really should be a listed con.
Camelot really needs to take a page from Nintendo's book. The Splatoon games are multiplayer focused, but offer enough single player content that can be revisited.
@MattmanForever Adding a 40+ hour single player campaign to a multiplayer game is going to take resources from the multiplayer part. So it is always a balancing act. Or the game development would just be twice or more as long.
@KayFiOS Actually this game isn't developed by Nintendo themselves but by Camelot. Splatoon is developed by Nintendo.
dont know why some people got their panties in a bunch over single player mode not having much wen sports games tend to focus more on multiplayer/online play mode and same goes for mario party games too.
Mario Sports is the one example in the entire sports genre where I kinda expect a robust single player mode.
It could just be nostalgia speaking, but I remember playing the heck out of Toadstool Tour and Mario Superstar Baseball on GameCube on my own. Haven't played them in ages though so maybe it's just that I was a kid and easily entertained.
@RiasGremory my thoughts exactly, it's a party game with a bonus single player mode thrown in. Not the other way round.
Will wait and buy it second hand off ebay in a few months for £25.
@LightSpirit I kinda get that they want to push multi player in that it creates bonds, strengthens the brand through family and friends connecting…. But this shouldn’t be at the expense of solo players. I just don’t have many friends who want to play Nintendo with me.
I really don't know why people think that sports games will have a good solo campaign. They never do.
@ShadLink I corrected it. This is what morning brain looks like lol.
Come to think of it though, Nintendo didn't make Splatoon 3 on their own, they also had Monolith Soft helping with it. As far as I know, Camelot is working by themselves, with maybe some help from Nintendo.
@batmanbud2 Amen !
Let's all forget about "Mario Golf Rush" and give us a "World Tour" sequel !
I still can't believe this game was so good...
@rvcolem1 man, why doesn't Nintendo always assume we have friends and family?
@Nep-Nep-Freak in 2026, even games that come fully on a cartridge still get updates. Get over it.
@Altaria_97 If you're talking about 64 and GC Tennis, you're absolutely correct. But when they announced a story mode I think a lot of people got their hopes up for something like GBC and GBA.
It looks servicable enough, and a worthy upgrade to MT Aces, which the kids and I had great fun with over the years.
Deducting points for lack of story mode is an odd decision; it's as if Nintendo set themselves up for failure by having this in an earlier interation, but kept it out for this one.
Where is it written in stone "thou must have a story mode" for a sports video game?
@MattmanForever
"As if it's impossible to have both a good solo campaign AND multiplayer, lol."
yeah, I had the thought but I didnt go there. that was the old Pedant. 😅✌️
I understand that we are all a bunch of lonely gamers who can't go out and make real friends and whatnot, but good gosh you guys are odd. I get that having more singleplayer content would have been good, of course! But why are we acting like it's a sin for the game to be focused on multiplayer? It's a sports game, for crying out loud! You know, the type of thing made to be played with other humans? sigh....
@N8tiveT3ch I'll be your friend, are you normal weird or super weird?
even with friends and family i am a single player..
Such a fantastically written review that has totally sold me on the game. A more fleshed out single player mode would definitely have been appreciated, but I've always gravitated to tennis games exclusively for local multiplayer and by the sounds of it, this does not disappoint. Many thanks for a brilliant review.
Its simply too expensive for a sports game. It would need a LOT including some beefy side modes and minigames(Mario Platforming challenges with the twist of needing to keep a tennis ball from hitting the ground and bouncing more then once while doing so, Tennis Battles where you aim to destroy your opponents base with your fever rackets and bob-ombs and other things like that.)
A simple tennis game won't hold me for long even with a few gimmicks and other sports games drop price fast and hard and unlike say...3D Mario or Zelda the quality and content isn't at a forever premium justifying level.
So they got rid of the design your own character with different kits and stuff from the 3DS iteration? (I played online mainly with Metal Mario) but the custom characters made it far more interesting. (Blooper Racket with different kits was fun to play against.) I don’t think it is a £60 game but I will probably still get it (Digital)
@CaleBoi25 🤣
"The console games never had any real single player content. It was always single player on the handheld and multiplayer on console. The Switch / Switch 2 versions are basically still "console" games even though the consoles are also handhelds."
even if the logic of the third sentence made sense, we are about 9 years out from the distinction between "handheld" and "console" having any relevance at all. 👍
"Honestly I would love to see a purely single player focussed Tennis game. But I don't think there is enough market for. (read: casual players don't care)"
I would love it, too! give me single player games with local 2-4p co op all day long.
IMO Nintendo has been absolutely rotting from the inside since they subtly shifted their focus from "young people who deeply care about videogames" to "aging 'casual gamers' and their apparently ambitionless children."
I get that it's how theyve made their fortune, but it's perverse to believe that monetary gain is evidence itself of artistic growth or creative evolution. often the opposite is true. (afterall, nobody argues facebook as a platform or google as a search engine are better now than when they started.)
I play games maybe 1-5 hrs a week, and I avoid the newer masochistic "git gud" style games, so I'm far from hardcore. but I do wish "casual" people who dont desire any challenge at all would go back to watching movies and taking long baths or whatever they were doing before Switch came out 😂✌️
@The_Nintendo_Expat
Camelot has an extremely small team of about 40 employees. I assume that's why they decided to prioritize multi player over single player
Mario Tennis having the same problems for the last 4 games is quite ridiculous.
@Willo567
i havent played this one yet, but I have played shining force II, golden sun, and many of camelot's sports games since the 1990s, and I can tell you that the recent stuff is a thin hollow shell of what they were once capable of.
@GoldenSunRM
Camelot were SUCH a great developer and they seem to have been asleep at the wheel for years, now. 🙁
Another reason my switch 2 will continue to gather dust in 2026.
Come on Nintendo let’s see these big AAA games you have hopefully been cooking up for us and releasing this year.
Such a shame about the single player lack of and adventure mode.
@The_Nintendo_Expat
All of those games you listed were on weaker hardware and probably took less manpower and money to develop for then the Switch 2
I was counting on the single player content to determine my buy, so it looks like I'm saving my money for FF7 Rebirth
@fezones,
"Get over it."
I'm not getting over it anytime soon. I am willing to buy a game digitally here and there for series that I really like, such as Pokémon, but physical is the GOAT.
I've already given up on Mario sports games being any good at this point so not surprised to see that this one is also lacking. The price point for what's on offer feels ridiculous to me.
@thenikdavies they’ve only released 6 games for Switch 2 (that arent upgrades of previous titles). Mariokart World and Kirby Air Riders were the only two predominantly multiplayer games so far. I think that Metroid Prime 4, Donkey Kong Bananza, Pokemon Legends ZA, and Hyrule Warriors AOI were all pretty good single player games…
Wow as a solo player this is a complete disappointment. Oh well. My switch 2 is a backlog machine at this point. It is what it is. Can't win em all.
@Willo567
"All of those games you listed were on weaker hardware and probably took less manpower and money to develop for then the Switch 2"
i dont know what this excuse does for you in regards to enjoying their contemporary output, but it does nothing for me.
OTOH, I've been arguing that hardware constraints = better games since at least the GBA era so you won't hear any argument from me on the facts. 👍
Well going by PJ's review I won't regret my preorder, even if I would have preferred a meatier single-player campaign mode. I'm glad to hear the game has a decent amount of content at launch, and plenty of unlockables.
(Yes, I'm a relic from the distant past and enjoy unlocking extra content while playing my games - it's always felt rewarding to me!)
I should add I find ways to enjoy pretty much any tennis video game I play - from TENNIS on the NES to ACES on the Switch, as long as the core gameplay and mechanics are solid. That sounds like the case here, and all the fever rackets and court shenanigans will be garnish on the main dish. And hopefully make it goofy-looking enough that my kids would want to play doubles with me.
Hmmm the cons are quite significant. Lack of single player content, adventure mode disappointingly short. Nintendo really has a multiplayer focus at the moment... good for some people, not useful for me sadly.
@The_Nintendo_Expat
Dude I'm only trying to explain why they probably focused more on the multiplayer then they did single player. I didn't realize stating facts was "making excuses" for them. I wasn't even planning on buying this game right now anyways and will wait for a sale
I was really looking forward to single player content. Even tho i like online. I love single player a lot more.
Another game designed for GameChat it seems.
Just as I expected, hoping I was wrong.
Skipping this one. 80 euros is way too much for a Mario Tennis with lacking solo modes.
What really grinds my gears is the fact they already figured out the solo modes with handheld titles, yet they simply refuse to bring that to home consoles. It is baffling.
It looks very fun. Camelot does it again.
I'm exclusively a single player person (or I play in person with friends) so I'll pass. Plus, online isn't too fun when you're a casual. My fave is Mario Tennis 64 which is really addicting lol.
@Theghostofkeithmoon wish I had kept hold of mine I do have a steam deck oled which I have to say is an emulation beast but it’s nice to have og hardware
@Teksette If you liked Aces, you are defo gonna love this. It's so much cleaner to play.
@Willo567
hey, fair enough. tone is hard on the internet ✌️ at least for me. I didnt mean to cop a tude tbh im just kind of a sh*t. 😂
you probably arent wrong that this is the reason their games have changed. I get what you are saying 👍
Removed - trolling/baiting
@The_Nintendo_Expat
Golden Sun was my thing.
Waiting on GS4 fruitlessly.
I look and see basic short adventure mode, and uh.
I expected it to be good and defining?
@thenikdavies
There's a new Fire Emblem coming. We'll be fine. Nintendo has always focused on multiplayer gaming.
@NolandC How is it a flop? The average score is 77. The only Mario Tennis that scored much higher is the N64 version. The much praised GameCube version scored 80 back in the day.
People's expectations have become somewhat unreasonable. I think scores are pretty good, and if you love arcade sport games this seems like it will be a blast. It's maybe not the best Mario game ever, but it's pretty much the best tennis game that is out there right now.
I’m happy to let this pass me by, as the lack of solo content seems to be a continuing trend from the Mario sports games on Switch - I’m still gutted about Mario Strikers, that had so much potential and could have been so much more
Removed - unconstructive feedback
@NolandC You seem to base that it's a flop on the reviews, so it would be fair to look at the average critic scores no?
67 reviews are in and the average is 77, then Nintendolife giving it a 8 does not seem to be far off. But yeah sure the lower reviews and the comments of people who haven't played it and won't play it are more valuable 🙃
@NolandC The comments are based in what the reviewer is saying about the single player as almost no one has it on their hands yet.
As for bias... I guess that you mean that a site focused on Nintendo games enjoys Nintendo games?
Lack of single player content could have been remedied with a challenge board akin to sakurai games. Imo that should be a standard feature for all these mario sports games.
Yeah sorry that's a pretty solid pass from me; the single player mode in Aces was distinctly slim and I was hoping they might have gone all out for this one.
@Nep-Nep-Freak same here. Big releases deserve physical copies. The next 3D Mario as digital-only? No way (will happen some day...).
Game Key Cards are a fair compromise. You still “own” something. You can trade, resell and shop around for better prices.
Digital-only is the real problem. Game Key Cards deserve a little more love.
Focus on online is strange. Mario Tennis Aces online = two months after launch and dead. No one playing online. It was impossible to play Mario Tennis Aces online.
Big no for me.
I'm not annoyed by this release because the last time I cared about a Mario sports game George W Bush was still in office but it is just kind of a bad look when Kirby Air Riders exists and Mario Kart World is likely to get major updates over the next few years, while this will get a few minor updates early on and then nothing else again after this year, while still being 70 dollars.
Nintendo should stop releasing every notable game at 70 dollars, this is clearly a 50 dollar game that is 70 dollars purely because 70 dollars is the norm.
@MattmanForever Anything less than a 40 hour single player mode would be too short for some. But even a 20 hour single player or a 10 hour single player would eat into multiplayer budget.
The price of $70 is literally nothing compared to the wages of developers, designers, etc. these days. Budgets on these games goes into millions.
cmon guys i expect atleast a 9 considering it has a 77 on metacritic average
@ShadLink this game probably cost like 50 million at most to make likely far less, if they sell the game for 70 dollars and sell the same as aces 4.5 million they would make 315 million dollars, so yes the game is way too expensive
I'm really not into multiplayer centric games so this will be a pass for me
That goofy Donkey Kong again. No thanks, I'll stick with my beloved Mario Tennis on N64.
@CaleBoi25 I know right? Hearing that a Mario Tennis game is light on single-player content is the least surprising news I've heard this year.
For the price (£55 to £60 physically), this is a bit disappointing. The first trailer made it me think there was a proper single mode and I was hyped about it. I cancelled my pre order based on a doubt it would be same as Aces in terms of solo modes and it seems that I was right. Maybe at £40 max I'll give it a go.
Funny how many negative comments here. The game got an 8, 77 on meta critic pretty dang good if you ask me. It’s meant to be a multiplayer focused game. tho I do understand the disappointment knowing how awesome Camelot is w its rpg lore and GB sports games. I do like hearing that it’s more easy to pick up and play for casual friends to play and have fun. Aces had a high skill ceiling which made it a bit less fun to play a beginner, and for me to play anyone online (got my butt kicked a lot, but that’s most online games for me 🙃
Is this not just fancy pong at its core?
Cheers for the review. The gameplay sounds great and something that gets me a little excited but the seemingly lacklustre adventure mode is a bummer. The best Mario Tennis series games had a good adventure mode.
People who are arguing with those raising valid concerns about lack of single player depth should go check out reviews from Mario Power Tennis or Toadstool Tour.
Mario games have always been designed to be “easy to approach, difficult to master” and the older Mario sports games were no different. It doesn’t mean we think that this game is bad. It’s just a shame the focus is now on party modes and multiplayer.
Again, nothing wrong with that. It’s just not my particular cup of tea. Especially as I get older, my time is limited, and I want to have an experience I can enjoyably grind on my own.
For any other sports game the fact that the multi-player outshines the single-player would come as no surprise, and certainly not a source of disappointment.
But the shadow of the Game Boy titles’ excellent RPG modes looms large with this series. I’m glad the core gameplay holds up, and that the single player at least seems like a step up from Aces, but I also would have loved to see a fully fledged Adventure Mode on par with the old games. The wait continues.
Looks a fun game to me, really. I'm sure I wouldn't mind it if I were to play it.
That said, and just pointing out something about the game I find interesting, some people don't like the Adventure mode in Fever, yet Camelot still won't make a full-on RPG like Golden Sun?
I just find this perhaps eye opening about the team and where they stand with the genre. Unless I'm wrong and they will prove they still care in a few years from now.
I thought if people liked the Adventure mode in Tennis, Camelot might be content enough making that their RPGs for now on. Looks like I might be wrong about that though.
No surprise to read a relatively poor experience for solo players. This is typically the case for any Nintendo sports title, including Mario Kart, as their key purpose is the multi player experience. Even the much vaunted MK8D, the single player was utter trash, especially for MK veterans. Typically the Cups are beaten on the first attempt, which continued into the paid booster courses and into Mario Kart World. At least the latter game included the brand new Knockout Mode and Free Roam to add longevity. I would not mark down Mario Tennis Fever for a slim solo experience because that's simply not the point of these games.
The one caveat with Mario Tennis, or any tennis game or sports game, is challenge. Playing solo means playing through an extended world tour, league, etc, on ever increasing difficulty standards. I recall the original Super Tennis only offered that, and it was a challenge and an enjoyable experience to beat the tour with a female and male player. The final challenge was a match against a super player (I can't remember his name), if I recall. Mario Tennis on 3DS was also a pure and challenging game, and provided one of my best solo experiences from any tennis game. Things like Adventure Modes are often too contrived, lack challenge, and prove underwhelming. Sport is about competition and challenge, so reading that there is some challenge is a positive. With the Fever racquets also sounding very interesting, I'm really looking forward to Mario Tennis Fever.
Ive got aces and didnt mind it, Ill pass on this for a while though.
Id like a nice adventure mode, after the 20 hrs Spent with Aces it was kinda boring to me
Another Nintendo first party game trying to sell Nintendo switch online memberships. Gotta hype up that C button
Why does it seem like Nintendo just can’t make a good single player sports game? I love golf and tennis video games but I don’t play multiplayer. And every game’s single player modes have been mediocre at best for years.
Honestly, modern mario sport games are just Mario slop.
@foofightingjohn this is a great question! The split screen drove me nuts in aces. If it does let you play multiplayer on one screen I would definitely sell aces and get this
@roy130390 I enjoy Nintendo games, but I also use subject reasoning on games that take forever to make, lack content and have an ever increasing price tag... Just because it's a Nintendo site doesn't mean they have to be bias ..
@NolandC Just because the reception on a Nintendo site is positive and is different from your personal score doesn't mean there's bias. People prioritize different aspects to judge a game and reviews, as objective as they try to be, end up always being a matter of the reviewer's perspective. The game looks gorgeous, runs flawlessly, it seems to have really good gameplay and while it seems to lack single player content compared to other games, it seems to offer a great multiplayer experience. Mario Kart 8 was the same and people still consider it one of the best games on Switch and was praised in reviews.
@dazzleshell
I don't have Switch 2 machine yet but I keep my eyes on the Switch 2 games release.
Was planning on avoiding this one anyway, as I've never been one for sports games to begin with (however, I can remotely tolerate baseball games, such as MLB Slugfest 2003, and maybe the occasional motocross game, like Freekstyle or Moto Racer).
It's the same with the Mario sports games; I can't even get into Mario Kart, after having lost interest in it from playing Mario Kart 7 way too much. I much prefer the Super Mario part of the Mario franchise, since the focus is more on adventure.
Besides, I don't have many friends to play online games with (and the ones that I do have don't want to play the games that I like because they tend to have a gacha mechanic, even though it's not required to enjoy the game; games such as Genshin Impact and Umamusume: Pretty Derby, for example), so I'm basically left with solo gaming experiences.
@NolandC It has a 77 on Metacritic. That means an 8 is completely in line with that. But you have a bias. You are judging it despite not having played it.
@Anti-Matter
If you still play a lot of games on Switch 1 as well as your PS5 I still recommend upgrading to Switch 2 as your Switch 1 games will run better on it.
Hopefully there'll be more Switch 2 games this year that sway you to upgrade though.
Disappointing to hear they didn’t really put any real meat into this game to justify the high price. Sadly, that’s what I came to expect from Mario Sports games.
@NolandC
It’s got a Metascore of 77 so an 8/10 is entirely typical
@roboshort I also recommend checking his post history...bursting at the seams with edge. Leather jackets, cigarettes etc.
Sounds like it's a bit bare bones for single players. Why can't they just have a long story mode the same way the GBA Tennis and Golf games did back in the day? Get Camelot back on Golden Sun.
No interest. I knew it was an 8 when they announced it. Very sound competent game with no heart. Might have well rehashed/remastered Aces. We live in the Age of Diminishing Returns....
So far I'm honestly kind of genuinely surprised at just how lame the story mode is. I was figuring it'd pretty much just be a collection of quick matches but that was giving it too much credit, it feels like just a really meandering tutorial. Given there's a separate How to Play mode anyway I have no clue why they did it this way.
@ozwally Same here. Battle League was a landmark for me, but in a very bad way. From that point on, Nintendo sports games for me will be a no if they follow that trend, which they're confirming now with Fever
@Lizuka Maybe that was their passive-agressive way of saying: no actual story mode for you! And that's really sad, unfortunately
@John_Deacon They really are, I was wondering if they'd change direction with solo content compared to Switch, but based on this my initial thoughts are I'll be skipping all Mario sports games on Switch 2 as this seems the way Nintendo wants to approach them.
Its like the odd direction with Mario Wonder too, I dont care for the multiplayer content at all there, but I do want the upgraded visuals
I'm honestly not too broken up about how the adventure mode turned out. I just wanna know if the tennis itself is good. That's what you're gonna be buying this for.
Sheesh. What a start to this generation. The vast majority of games are either game key cards or anime style nonsense. The few games I was somewhat interested in, fall short. Metroid put too much behind a paywall of amiibo, and this game is too focused on multiplayer online play. Can't wait to see how Nintendo lets me down next.
@KevinP nobody's stopping you from walking away if you're this disappointed. Don't let games wind you up like this.
Mario Tennis Online legs = 2 months. Two months after launch, and Mario Tennis Aces was online dead.
@KevinP
As a 42 year old gamer who was obsessed with Metroid Prime on Gamecube, played all 3, including the Wii bundle with motion controls and Prime Remastered....I honestly adore Prime 4. It feels new and fresh, and it looks and sounds stunning.
Maybe I'm in the minority.
But I'm also loving Mario Tennis Fever. Mainly as a family multiplayer game, its brilliant.
Playing this I was impressed by how good and smooth it looks, but when I tried playing some exhibition matches without the gimmick rackets, it really shows off how dependent this game is upon those gimmicks. Like the two hardest difficulty AI's are basically impossible to beat without them. It's like you can never really hit shots that push the boundaries, and you will just get locked into an infinite rally where the AI can just always hit anything you throw at it.
I struggle with a game obtaining the label of Good or a score of 8/10, when the cons mention how poor of a game this is for solo players and campaign content. I miss the days so dang badly, when Nintendo Sport games provided great campaigns, content, and RPG elements for solo players. Considering how lacking Nintendo is regarding online functionally, I find it even more complexing that solo play appears to no longer be a focus point for them.
@N00BiSH Many of us continue to play solo mode. Due to this, Nintendo sport games for a while now have been disappointing.
@abbyhitter Many of us did my friend, but the trend with their sport games continues. 😢
@LilKinopio I'm not saying you're wrong to want more single player options, but I think people put too much stock into adventure mode specifically.
Currently, my least favorite part is that when playing free-play, you can't randomize the rackets and I'd like that option. Maybe you get it if you unlock all of them, but right now it's a bit annoying. Otherwise, I'm enjoying the game.
@N00BiSH You don't like adventuring fine sir?!
@LilKinopio the adventure modes are fine, but they've never been the sole driving force for me to play Mario Tennis. They are multiplayer-oriented games at their core so that is what I'm going to put most of my time into, especially when you consider how short the adventure modes usually are.
This seems really interesting and I do love Mario Tennis. So, I'd want to get this earlier in the console life cycle to have more online time with it. The backlog is only growing however, so I think I'll have to wait for a sale, but I do intend to pick this up at some point in the year.
Sorry but that score is way too high. That puts it up there with Mario Power Tennis on GameCube which had so much content and fun gameplay and this game is so barebones in comparison and the courts are so uninspired like with Mario Golf Super Rush.
I'll pass on it just like that one
@roboshort Oh look I was right, told you soo... More Nintendo slop, and toxic Nintendo positivity...
@roy130390 Oh look I was right, told you soo... Stop buying into the fake toxic positivity.
@NolandC You were right about what? You made a dumb accusation, didn't know how to back it up, people pointed out the lack of logic and then you stayed quiet until now. No idea of what changed according to that little head of yours.
@roy130390 it's like I'm talking to a flatearther... The game is GARBAGE ... Get it? You're lying to yourself if you think otherwise... You're apart of the problem yo why they rush and make crap games, you'll just accept them... And I'm the one without logic??? Fing clueless. You clearly have zero pattern recognition, along with the rest of this toxic community.
@NolandC The irony in your comments is hilarious. Best part is, you don't even realize that I don't have an opinion on the game, I'm just telling you why there's nothing about this review that indicates bias, much less confirm it. You see everything in black and white and can't even fathom that not everything is an extreme.
"Oh , a Nintendo site! Everyone must be a dumb fanboy except me. I'm such a genius!"
"Of course a reviewer on a Nintendo site must be lying about enjoying the game and the score's inflated. Everyone's too dumb to reach that brilliant conclusion like I did!"
That must have felt like reading your mind right?
You are not some gaming industry's savior that holds the truth. You are just the other extreme. The edgy one that hates without comprehending why and isn't able to think by yourself because just like the fanboy mob, there's a hater mob. Just a different color of sheep.
Look, this might be crazy to you but you don't have to stay here. If you think that low about the community and the site... why don't you simply go away and engage with one that you prefer? One that is similar to that brilliant, special mind of yours. For such a genius, that simple solution seems to be escaping you.
If you don't mind, please don't make me waste my time. I mean, you are free to keep this discussion going on, but personally I lost interest and they might remove comments if we keep going on. If you decide to respond, you can have the last word buddy, but I won't read your replies anymore. I feel like you need that "victory", so it's all yours champ. You certainly showed me!
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...